tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12601677.post3356814470325603897..comments2024-02-15T03:21:16.037-07:00Comments on Pot Calling Kettle: Unified LeadersVincehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05285748585725536330noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12601677.post-85068281752430277442007-04-13T11:43:00.000-06:002007-04-13T11:43:00.000-06:00Are you sure Dad Black was only correcting your sp...Are you sure Dad Black was only correcting your spelling? What <I>is</I> philosophical purity? How can a philosophy be pure? Does it mean "biblical"? "Coherent"?<BR/><BR/>Dinkin' flicka.Bryan C. McWhitehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17041068865631893392noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12601677.post-25330179910941689772007-04-12T21:32:00.000-06:002007-04-12T21:32:00.000-06:00well, i can't believe you disagreed with me. what...well, i can't believe you disagreed with me. what kind of blog is this anyway?David Ruddhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12572780147564110421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12601677.post-63214463897230595342007-04-12T08:33:00.000-06:002007-04-12T08:33:00.000-06:00Vince,I agree with #1 & #2 (throwing david's comme...Vince,<BR/><BR/>I agree with #1 & #2 (throwing david's comment about trust in with #2) as components of unified leadership. <BR/><BR/>On #3, I would say that there has to be some philosophical purity, but you don't want to stifle creativity. And even with unity, you still need a prophetic voice that maintains balance on matters of how the church is going to implement her mandates. <BR/><BR/>Plus it is good for people to submit to a philosophical decision that they might not totally agree with. You take to hard of a line on "philosophical purity" and you you're just gonna wind up with a new type of fundamentalism when it comes to how things work in a particular church. Do you then split over a logo or font choices? To you hire based on their view regarding fill-in-the-blanks on sermon outlines vs. no outline handed out? Important decisions - to some degree yeah. I think you see where I'm going. <BR/><BR/>(sorry this was long)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09788799829682970336noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12601677.post-63871372965413893682007-04-12T08:31:00.000-06:002007-04-12T08:31:00.000-06:00david - i believe trust would fall under all of th...david - i believe trust would fall under all of them. trust should be the foundation by which you build a board. <BR/><BR/>dad - philosophical purity is the idea that...oh, i see. you were correcting my spelling.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10940109726867833645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12601677.post-31793069988416582122007-04-12T08:25:00.000-06:002007-04-12T08:25:00.000-06:00What is philisophical purity?What is philisophical purity?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12601677.post-23596248657679069522007-04-12T06:34:00.000-06:002007-04-12T06:34:00.000-06:00i don't know if this fits under #2, but i would su...i don't know if this fits under #2, but i would suggest trust is essential.<BR/><BR/>a subpoint of trust would be the ability to strongly disagree without fearing for loss of realationship.David Ruddhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12572780147564110421noreply@blogger.com